Re: Upper ontologies

Hey Mikael,

I'm curious too -- I'm sure you'll hear a few opinions if you'd like post
this question over at KGC's answer board:
https://answers.knowledgegraph.tech/

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:19 AM Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 05:36:06PM +0100, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 05:40:30PM +0200, Mikael Pesonen wrote:
> > > Maybe this is a stupid question but why is there (at the moment) 17
> > > different upper ontologies:
> > >
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_ontology
> > >
> > > Isn't the idea to make just one that everyone can use?
> >
> > Maybe because of https://xkcd.com/927/ ? :)
>
>    I find it disappointing that there's only one of those cartoons.
>
>    Hugo.
>
> --
> Hugo Mills             | Your problem is that you've got too much taste to
> be
> hugo@... carfax.org.uk | a web developer.
> http://carfax.org.uk/  |
> PGP: E2AB1DE4          |                                          Steve
> Harris
>
>

-- 
Ellie Young, Head of Community
The Knowledge Graph Conference
+13127809243
https://www.knowledgegraph.tech/