Re: Blank nodes must DIE! [ was Re: Blank nodes semantics - existential variables?]

Le 28/07/2020 à 00:17, Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) a écrit :
>> [QUDT] does not define any code for units and could be used together with UCUM, by the way.
> 
> Actually QUDT defines multiple annotation properties for symbols and code, including UCUM. But they are not consistently populated in the QUDT database.

I think that this confirms (and complement) what I have said: that QUDT 
itself does not define unit codes, but can be used in combination with 
existing codes such as UCUM, right?

--AZ

> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
>> Sent: Tuesday, 28 July, 2020 06:47
>> To: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>
>> Cc: Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>; Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>;
>> Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>; Maxime Lefrançois
>> <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>
>> Subject: Re: Blank nodes must DIE! [ was Re: Blank nodes semantics -
>> existential variables?]
>>
>> Le 27/07/2020 à 22:02, Martynas Jusevičius a écrit :
>>> Hi Antoine,
>>>
> ...
>>>
>>> A side question (haven't followed the thread very much): how does UCUM
>>> compare to QUDT? https://qudt.org/
>>
>> UCUM is the Unified Code of Unit of Measurements. It is a wait to write units
>> (all units) in a way that can be transmitted electronically (such as, in an email,
>> or in a CSV file, or JSON, or in Excel, or in an IP packet sent by a sensor). QUDT
>> is a Web ontology for the domain of measurements, units of measures,
>> quantities, and related stuff. It does not define any code for units and could
>> be used together with UCUM, by the way. But it can also express the
>> precision of a measurement, the tools used to measure a quantity, and much
>> more.
>>
>> cdt:ucum is only a way of expressing physical quantities and nothing else, in a
>> literal.
>>
>> --AZ

Received on Monday, 27 July 2020 22:42:55 UTC