- From: Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 10:59:02 +0200
- To: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Cc: Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>
Hi, Thank you Antoine and Maxime for the work on ucum and the explanations that I find very helpful. On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:34:35PM +0200, Antoine Zimmermann wrote: > <measurement> :value "2.5 m"^^cdt:ucum; > :precision "1 %"^^cdt:ucum . But you could also have: <measurement> :value "2.5 m +- 1 %"^^my:measuredatatype What would make you chose one over the other ? The fact that ucum is already available as an extension in your SPARQL engine and that you do not want to develop a new one ? Can you see other criterions ? -- Nicolas Chauvat logilab.fr - services en informatique scientifique et gestion de connaissances
Received on Saturday, 25 July 2020 08:59:27 UTC