- From: Joshua Shinavier <joshsh@uber.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 11:29:20 -0800
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>, W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>, Ryan Wisnesky <ryan@conexus.ai>, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com>
- Message-ID: <CAPc0OuvA+1aDQmgY6hv1OemY8s0No_dODzv3SpiyrF8pjKM6zA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Henry, I think it's a great idea, and you can count me in. Right now, there are a number of disconnected threads on CT + graph data models and semantics which I think would benefit from a central place to interact. I know next to nothing about HoTT, but am interested in learning, and I am also interested in connecting the work Ryan and I have done on type algebras for graphs with yours on RDF semantics and modal logics. We can bounce topics around between the community group and local meetups like this one <https://www.meetup.com/Category-Theory/>, compare notes on applied CT in industry, etc. Josh On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 2:18 AM Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > Hi all, > > we have been discussing the possibility of opening a > Category Theory community group, which would allow people > interested in CT to have a space to talk about how it > applies to web standards, from RDF, SPARQL, Property Graphs, > etc... all the way to HTTP. This could attract mathematicians > and allow them to see which other groups could be helped > from some theoretical input, write up a wiki of concepts > and papers that are related, and a lot more…. > > Feedback welcome :-) > > > On 23 Sep 2019, at 15:08, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program < > metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Good. Finally we are starting to see the light. But an even more > generalized model is possible, because the essence here is representing > data, whereas there are two more levels, i.e. information and knowledge. > And both can also be captured using category theory and formal algebra, but > with a twist. > > Yes, I agree. Knowledge involves modal concepts (at least Nozick’s > definition > in Philosophical Explanations gave some very good reason to believe so). > > I recently discovered that an introductory book on Modal HoTT (for > philosophers) > was to come out soon. In the already published chapter 4 is written there > that > > "The slogan here is that, where HoTT itself is the internal language of > (∞,1)-toposes, modal HoTT is the internal language for collections of > (∞,1)-toposes related by geometric morphisms” > > This brings a whole new level of mathematical clarity to the subject. > I wrote up a blog post to help me read that article with pointers to > articles > and research here: > > ”Modal HoTT on the Web" > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__medium.com_-40bblfish_modal-2Dhott-2Don-2Dthe-2Dweb-2D2f4f7996b41f&d=DwIFaQ&c=r2dcLCtU9q6n0vrtnDw9vg&r=yHrezOOUvTAeD_KgsElyJw&m=sJkaNiUxXJYCYfF4xgsQlmABOvV46PxRsQhysaHtPV8&s=L6vOafbKZOTAyP28333raC5Dq5vmW12OwfRHkqDQYtc&e= > > Henry > > > > > Milton Ponson > > GSM: +297 747 8280 > > PO Box 1154, Oranjestad > > Aruba, Dutch Caribbean > > Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to > all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied > mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development > > > > > > On Monday, September 23, 2019, 9:10:16 AM ADT, Henry Story < > henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > An interesting paper linking knowledge graphs, property graphs and > > RDF together via Category Theory > > > > Algebraic Property Graphs > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__arxiv.org_abs_1909.04881&d=DwIFaQ&c=r2dcLCtU9q6n0vrtnDw9vg&r=yHrezOOUvTAeD_KgsElyJw&m=sJkaNiUxXJYCYfF4xgsQlmABOvV46PxRsQhysaHtPV8&s=I9aF_uWTQtoPPSUuHpW7VCD-lEMXL7UlCsm7ECkIh-c&e= > > > > Henry Story > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2019 19:29:35 UTC