- From: Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:03:03 +0000
- To: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hi Juan, Many thanks. I know this is the SemWeb group; although the thing that interests me is Linked Data, which is sort of related. I don't want to cross-post, so I'll just ask here. So was there anyone at the workshop interested in Linked Data? Specifically how LD-style URIs relate to PGs and Neo4J? That is, PGs relating to the core LD stuff: resolvable and globally addressable IDs. I see little or no mention of IDs, URIs or anything like that, and any implications that would have for the PG technologies. Is no-one interested in that? I would have asked in person, but sadly I was not chosen to be invited ;-) - I'm guessing because such interests are not widely shared (I never saw the criteria for choosing invitees). Or maybe everyone understands it all, and it isn't a big issue - if so, can anyone point my at a simple exposition of the issues please? Best Hugh > On 8 Mar 2019, at 18:42, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com> wrote: > > All, > > I wrote my trip report on the W3C Graph Data workshop: http://www.juansequeda.com/blog/2019/03/08/w3c-graph-data-workshop-trip-report/ > > It was a successful event! In a nutshell > – There is a unified and vibrant graph community. > – A W3C Business Group will be formed and serve as a liaison between different interested parties. > – There is a push for RDF*/SPARQL* to be a W3C Member submission. > – There is interest to standardize a Property Graph data model with a schema. > – There is interest to standardize mappings between Property Graphs and RDF. > > Best, > > Juan > > > > -- > Juan Sequeda, Ph.D > www.juansequeda.com -- Hugh 023 8061 5652
Received on Monday, 11 March 2019 22:03:44 UTC