- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:40:37 +0800
- To: SW-forum <semantic-web@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2019 07:41:36 UTC
In relation to RDF and FOL Just thinking loud (not asking any question) I know that there is an underlying argument that all logic is essentially FOL (never mind exceptions and other POVs Was going through some papers and some relevant points came up Automation of Higher-Order Logic Authors: Christoph Benzm¨uller and Dale Miller Readers: Peter Andrews, Jasmin Blanchette, William Farmer, Herman Geuvers, and Bruno Woltzenlogel Paleo Venue: The Handbook of the History of Logic, eds. D. Gabbay & J. Woods Volume 9: Logic and Computation, editor J¨org Siekmann http://www.lix.polytechnique.fr/~dale/papers/automationHOL.pdf Bundy, A., van Harmelen, F., Horn, C., Smaill, A., 1990. The Oyster-Clam system, in: Stickel, M.E. (Ed.), 10th International Conference on Automated Deduction, Computational Logic Page 145 https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=H9-pCAAAQBAJ&lpg=PA145&ots=AidwU3D11M&dq=oyster%20logic&pg=PA145#v=onepage&q=oyster%20logic&f=false
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2019 07:41:36 UTC