- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 17:36:28 +0800
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SqeMPuZwpJu=HS-0hoTOJ10P=s1wTOOcN=0hvmJWo_zzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Henry Thanks for capturing and relaying this issue with a sense of urgency. Just recently I experienced someone take control of my keyboard via the browser to write something by itself on my twitter line (as if I didnt write enough silly things on my own?) I know this is some kind hacker informing me that my browser is vulnerable in some friendly way (I learned about this service from chatting to hackers themselves) I still feel deeply violated tho, and scared. Hope this is understood and addressed and yes, W3C should at a minimum provide widespread awareness on this new risk. Keep us informed PDM On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 4:44 PM Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > In a recent article on Deep Fakes in the Washington Post, > Assistant Prof. of Global Politics Dr. Brian Klaas, University > College London, wrote > "You thought 2016 was a mess? You ain't seen nothing yet.” > > https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/05/14/deepfakes-are-coming-were-not-ready/ > > Deep fakes are produced by new technological breakthroughs that allows one > to > realistically create live videos of real people, to make them say whatever > one > wants them to say with the right tone of voice too. There is no turning > back > this technology, and this will bring us back to a pre-photographic world, > where trust in the coherence and authorship of a story is all we have to > go > by for believability. > > But we have no good system of trust one the web. X509 certificates are > much > too uninformative to be of interest. With the deployment of Let’s Encrypt > anyone can get a free certificate. That is actually great, because it > solves > the problem that TLS can solve: namely that one has reached the web server > named by the domain. But it cannot tell us anything interesting about where > we landed, what company it is, what jurisdiction they are under, what legal > system it is repsonbible to, and how that is related diplomatically to the > country to which the web surfer is embedded. We do not know if that entity > is > in legal trouble or not. We know nothing really. Is it surprising that > fake news and scams have completely ovewhelmed us? > > The tremendous growth of Phishing is just one aspect of the fake news > problem > that has been plaguing us recently. And the only answer is to tie the legal > institutions in an open way into the browsing experience of every day > users. > > I have detailed how this can be done in my 2nd year Phd report, and have > also written this up as a couple of blog posts > > "Stopping (https) phishing" > https://medium.com/cybersoton/stopping-https-phishing-42226ca9e7d9 > > In the thesis I have started using Abadi’s logic of "saying that” which is > both a modal logic and a strong monad from category theory, to work out how > one can formalize the intuitions of the Linked Data community. > > One thing this allows us to do is to think logically also of user > interfaces, > and to make actually very coherent and enticing proposals for how one can > make > this information available in our everyday browsing experience. In > "Phishing in Context - Epistemology of the screen" > https://medium.com/cybersoton/phishing-in-context-9c84ca451314 > > The semantic web as a knowledge representation language that is > decentralised > is exactly the right tool to use here, as it can help us weave nations > together > into a web, without requiring impossible global centralisation. > > We have all the technology to do this. We just need to bring the right > people together, > a task that the W3C excels at. > > > Henry Story > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2019 09:37:48 UTC