- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:04:41 +0800
- To: ontolog-forum <ontolog-forum@googlegroups.com>
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>, semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SrD7cB76UVeZ-pBNuB+k69BFSzKL_2Q9PEqFJ4tN-nejg@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks, yes! On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:58 AM joseph simpson <jjs0sbw@gmail.com> wrote: > All: > > The statement: > > "Interdisciplinarity is fundamental to problem solving in most domains, > and applied science and engineering are concerned primarily with problem > solving, rather than purely theoretical formulations" > > Appears to relate directly to General Systems Theory. See: > > > https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323387658_A_General_Systems_Context_for_Structural_Modeling > > https://www.panarchy.org/boulding/systems.1956.html > > The proper alignment of natural language and formal language may be > addressed in a range of view points. > > Some issues and ideas are outlined at: > > > https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324138184_System_Concepts_and_Theories > > Take care, be good to yourself and have fun, > > Joe > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 1:42 AM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thank you Alex >> >> variations/elaborations welcome (Vx) >> >> There is a problem with math KR tho - which has been discussed forever >> I ll summarise it briefly hoping to put things to rest: >> >> Interdisciplinarity is fundamental to problem solving in most domains, >> and applied science and engineering are concerned primarily with problem >> solving, rather than purely theoretical formulations >> >> Interdisciplinarity means not everyone uses maths ( apparently even >> mathematicians sometimes use different types of maths) Most domain experts >> are not mathematicians >> >> Therefore, maths, like ml should also be translatable/mappable to to >> plain natural language, even better to some diagrammatic notation or >> logical language that reproduces the logical schema ideally, problems and >> solutions should be represented in a multiplicity of ways >> >> This particular postulate - luckily I dont wake up early morning to >> postulate very often - has been prompted but the need to fill a gap between >> symbolic an subsymbolic KR as per the posts, and having a citable reference >> I am sure it can be refined further >> PDM >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:29 PM Alex Shkotin <alex.shkotin@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Paola, >>> >>> I keep in mind a variation of your postulate: >>> Any algorithm (including MLA) has math representation. >>> >>> This is all that we have been talking about since Leibniz: math >>> knowledge representation:-) >>> The problem is that computer programs and DBs are not mathematical structures >>> but they work:-) >>> >>> Alex >>> >>> пн, 26 авг. 2019 г. в 05:27, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Since posting discussions about bridging the gap between symbolic and >>>> subsymbolic, (see related posts) I have formulated a simple postulate, and >>>> assigned a DOI so that anone following up on these discussions can cite the >>>> contribution accordingly. I ll be happy to review the postulate with >>>> comments and suggestions if any >>>> >>>> To support AI explainability, learnability,verifiability and >>>> reproducibility, it is postulated that >>>> for each MLA *machine learning algorithm, >>>> there should correspond a natural language expression or other type of >>>> symbolic knowledge representation >>>> >>>> https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9730268.v2 >>>> >>>> https://figshare.com/articles/A_New_Postulate_for_Knowledge_Representation_in_AI/9730268 >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> All contributions to this forum are covered by an open-source license. >>>> For information about the wiki, the license, and how to subscribe or >>>> unsubscribe to the forum, see http://ontologforum.org/info/ >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "ontolog-forum" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to ontolog-forum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ontolog-forum/CAMXe%3DSrRtE0_8O3jtKKA%3D%2BOR%2BWUbFjCQi4Fxy_EzenO1CiYNjA%40mail.gmail.com >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ontolog-forum/CAMXe%3DSrRtE0_8O3jtKKA%3D%2BOR%2BWUbFjCQi4Fxy_EzenO1CiYNjA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> -- >>> All contributions to this forum are covered by an open-source license. >>> For information about the wiki, the license, and how to subscribe or >>> unsubscribe to the forum, see http://ontologforum.org/info/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "ontolog-forum" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to ontolog-forum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ontolog-forum/CAFxxROSc2ks%2BMsg-52eHktHVkQVRrKZCc8sXBSExXq5kv62ocQ%40mail.gmail.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ontolog-forum/CAFxxROSc2ks%2BMsg-52eHktHVkQVRrKZCc8sXBSExXq5kv62ocQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- >> All contributions to this forum are covered by an open-source license. >> For information about the wiki, the license, and how to subscribe or >> unsubscribe to the forum, see http://ontologforum.org/info/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "ontolog-forum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ontolog-forum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ontolog-forum/CAMXe%3DSovddhOskeG-uOWNYuLapDQ%3DcNM7u%3DDDNq6k3va3i5zjQ%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ontolog-forum/CAMXe%3DSovddhOskeG-uOWNYuLapDQ%3DcNM7u%3DDDNq6k3va3i5zjQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > > > -- > Joe Simpson > “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people > attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, > depends on unreasonable people.” > George Bernard Shaw > Git Hub link: > https://github.com/jjs0sbw > Research Gate link: > https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joseph_Simpson3 > YouTube Channel > https://www.youtube.com/user/jjs0sbw > Web Site: > https://systemsconcept.org/ > > > -- > All contributions to this forum are covered by an open-source license. > For information about the wiki, the license, and how to subscribe or > unsubscribe to the forum, see http://ontologforum.org/info/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ontolog-forum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ontolog-forum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ontolog-forum/CAPnyebyaNH-GhM6aQuP%3DB8TSkBaXhL-pREscgK2iiXp6HTTnWw%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ontolog-forum/CAPnyebyaNH-GhM6aQuP%3DB8TSkBaXhL-pREscgK2iiXp6HTTnWw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . >
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2019 03:05:43 UTC