- From: Dimitris Kontokostas <jimkont@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:14:35 +0300
- To: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
- Cc: janowicz@ucsb.edu, Timothy Cook <tim@datainsights.tech>, Ben De Meester <ben.demeester@ugent.be>, Jim Balhoff <balhoff@renci.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+u4+a2o18wQPV3R5GL8pvUsTk3EWRjSkZX7xBTp4vqB=Acd6A@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018, 08:37 Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com> wrote: > So RDFUnit does have a SHACL to SPARQL translator? > Yes, there is no direct API for that but it is easy to generate the set of SPARQL queries that correspond to a shacl graph. But, a few shacl constructs (or, xone, not and qualified*) are not yet supported. > -- > Juan Sequeda, Ph.D > www.juansequeda.com > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 4:41 PM Dimitris Kontokostas <jimkont@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> You can validate RDF data directly on a SPARQL endpoint using RDFUnit (as >> well as in memory validation of course) >> ShEx is not yet supported but you can use SHACL and OWL (in CWA) >> >> Best, >> Dimitris >> >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 7:35 PM Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Very cool! >>> >>> My only concern is that users have to upload data. Even if I have this >>> installed on my own servers. >>> >>> I want to keep my data in my RDF Graph database. Is there a way that it >>> can validate the data in-place? >>> >>> -- >>> Juan Sequeda, Ph.D >>> www.juansequeda.com >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 11:22 AM Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Just FYI; we also have a nice tool in development. You can see a >>>> screen-cast (for now without audio) here: >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPJ7Mn5q1vw >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Krzysztof >>>> >>>> On 10/22/18 3:32 AM, Timothy Cook wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks for the clarification. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 9:00 PM Ben De Meester <ben.demeester@ugent.be> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Tim, >>>>> >>>>> We're working on a collaborative editing workflow that uses Github >>>>> repositories as data source, >>>>> however, you are correct that we shouldn't ask that permission >>>>> upfront, only when required. >>>>> We will put this in our issue tracker, thanks for the comment! >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> Ben >>>>> Ben De Meester >>>>> Researcher Semantic Web >>>>> imec - Ghent University - IDLab | Faculty of Engineering and >>>>> Architecture | Department of Electronics and Information Systems >>>>> Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 19, 9052 Ghent, Belgium >>>>> t: +32 9 331 49 59 | e: ben.demeester@ugent.be | URL: >>>>> http://users.ugent.be/~bjdmeest/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Op za 6 okt. 2018 om 13:14 schreef Timothy Cook >>>>> <tim@datainsights.tech> <tim@datainsights.tech>: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 1:42 PM Ben De Meester <ben.demeester@ugent.be> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi James, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In fact, we will be presenting our work concerning features for a >>>>>>> visual data shapes editor next ISWC2018 @ the VOILA workshop: >>>>>>> http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2187/paper2.pdf >>>>>>> A first proof-of-concept is available online: unSHACLed: >>>>>>> https://w3id.org/imec/unshacled/app , and we are actively >>>>>>> continuing development. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you have any questions, feel free to ask! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, my question is: >>>>>> Why do you need access to my private repositories on GitHub in order >>>>>> for me to evaluate unSHACLed? >>>>>> Seems like a pretty unreasonable request. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Tim >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Timothy W. Cook, CEO >>>> Data Insights, Inc. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Krzysztof Janowicz >>>> >>>> Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara >>>> 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 >>>> >>>> Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu >>>> Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ >>>> Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net >>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> Kontokostas Dimitris >> >
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2018 06:17:22 UTC