Re: visualization of ShEx or SHACL

Thanks for the clarification.

On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 9:00 PM Ben De Meester <ben.demeester@ugent.be>
wrote:

> Hi Tim,
>
> We're working on a collaborative editing workflow that uses Github
> repositories as data source,
> however, you are correct that we shouldn't ask that permission upfront,
> only when required.
> We will put this in our issue tracker, thanks for the comment!
>
> Kind regards,
> Ben
> Ben De Meester
> Researcher Semantic Web
> imec - Ghent University - IDLab | Faculty of Engineering and Architecture
> | Department of Electronics and Information Systems
> Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 19, 9052 Ghent, Belgium
> t: +32 9 331 49 59 | e: ben.demeester@ugent.be | URL:
> http://users.ugent.be/~bjdmeest/
>
>
>
> Op za 6 okt. 2018 om 13:14 schreef Timothy Cook <tim@datainsights.tech>:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 1:42 PM Ben De Meester <ben.demeester@ugent.be>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> In fact, we will be presenting our work concerning features for a visual
>>> data shapes editor next ISWC2018 @ the VOILA workshop:
>>> http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2187/paper2.pdf
>>> A first proof-of-concept is available online: unSHACLed:
>>> https://w3id.org/imec/unshacled/app , and we are actively continuing
>>> development.
>>>
>>> If you have any questions, feel free to ask!
>>>
>>>
>> Yeah, my question is:
>> Why do you need access to my private repositories on GitHub in order for
>> me to evaluate unSHACLed?
>> Seems like a pretty unreasonable request.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>>
>

-- 
Timothy W. Cook, CEO
Data Insights, Inc.