- From: Martin McEvoy <martin@weborganics.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:46:11 +0100
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr>, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFUkNjmT4wSRhFk6CrNi7W=wUv-07WudMoCYm+P7dob6G7N-Zw@mail.gmail.com>
Hyperdata is actually much more appropriate in today's modern landscape. Best wishes Martin On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, 15:43 Henry Story, <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > > > On 18 Oct 2018, at 16:23, Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> > wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 02:32:29PM +0200, Frans Knibbe wrote: > > To me, the term 'machine-readable web' excludes an important target group: > us humans (assuming all current list subscribers are human). When I try > explain the concepts of Linked Data or the Semantic Web to an uninitiated I > like to use the terms 'web of data' or even shorter 'data web'. For some > more finesse the term 'the web of self-explanatory data', could be > considered, but I think just putting the terms 'web' and 'data' together > sets the tone well enough. > Also, a term like 'data web' is happily free of technicalities. > > > +10 > > > I like the word hyper-data, as it helps both > 1) show the continuity it has with hyper-text > 2) has a fascinating relation to what is know as hyper-systems as > described > Rutten, J. J. (2000). Universal coalgebra: a theory of systems. > * Theoretical computer science*, *249*(1), 3-80. > > http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.159.2020&rep=rep1&type=pdf > > which is a function of the form S -> 2^2^S > > ie one that takes you from a state to a set of sets of such states. Sets > of states are > often thought of as propositions, and sets of sets of those sounds like > quad stores. > > > > perhaps even a corner stone like RDF might be replaced by something that is > considered better in the future? > > > I heard of https://ipfs.io/ lately. > > > IPFS is a protocol, so in the realm of coalgebras, whereas RDF is a data > format and > so in the realm of algebras. Both are orthogonal, and defined in dual > categories. > RDF is defined in terms of IRIs and so could easily describe states on a > IPFS System, > just as it can on an HTTPS one. > > > > -- > Nicolas Chauvat > > logilab.fr - services en informatique scientifique et gestion de > connaissances > > >
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2018 16:46:46 UTC