W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > November 2018

Re: URIs declination

From: Sebastian Samaruga <ssamarug@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 20:20:41 -0300
Message-ID: <CAOLUXBvz-4=rd4dt6qNubuSEYmezGdp3zdio+zAQuzhqpUdZnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
Cc: W3C Semantic Web IG <semantic-web@w3.org>
Thanks! I'll be delving in the subject now.

Regarding the skein of threads that had been lately for a while, I think
that HTML was the killer app for SGML, removing all the clutter and
providing a single, concise DTD and, most importantly, standardized the
concept of browser plus the HTTP protocol.

I've not seen any similar, towards simplicity and not just adding more
standards or recommendations in the mix for what would be the realization
of SW, as it was for the web in general.


On Tue, Nov 27, 2018, 6:49 PM Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org wrote:

> This is generally handled via annotating the link (i.e. the RDF triple)
> and explains the rapid growth in interest in property graphs. The upcoming
> W3C workshop on graph data will consider how to make it easier to support
> property graphs in RDF, see:
> https://www.w3.org/Data/events/data-ws-2019/cfp.html
> On 27 Nov 2018, at 21:34, Sebastian Samaruga <ssamarug@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there a way for embedded "declinations" in URIs forming a statement in
> the manner of an Subject Verb Object language statement (tense, person,
> etc.). Given a determinate ontology, is there a way to make "parseable"
> that determinate Predicate occurred in the past? (I mean, without resorting
> in more statements, something maybe encoded in them like hashes that an
> engine could parse). Could this allow for example to encode negation in
> statements?
> Best,
> Sebastian.
> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
> W3C Data Activity Lead & W3C champion for the Web of things
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2018 23:22:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:57 UTC