- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:34:35 +0100
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: SW-forum <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <7AE0CF64-6950-4DA3-A210-20CA12B4C2D6@bblfish.net>
Some other ideas of things that could be explained: - a clear explanation of the relation between the semantic-web logico-mathematical model of RDF, and the linked data usage - a model of how contexts fit into the current RDF/Linked Data space (not sure if I can get that far). > On 19 Dec 2018, at 07:15, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 13:36, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net <mailto:henry.story@bblfish.net>> wrote: > Hi, > > I am writing a thesis with the hope of going beyond > Roy Fielding's famous thesis by developing a mathematical > theory of the web based on category theory, game theory > and modal logic that would allow me to answer a number > of outstanding questions such as http-range-14. [1] > > Are there other issues of the sort that I could use > as examples to show the usefulness of such a theory? > > My understanding of the issue was that hr14 was painful in the same way that pointers are painful in C. > > ie in C pointers point to data when dereferenced > > on the web URLs (UDIs?) point to documents which are dereferenced > > in both cases data structures are returned > > in both cases they are generally considered to be a source of confusion to programmers (maybe that's just the nature of pointers?) > > in both cases you can actually reuse the pointers themselves e.g. with pointer arithmetic, but it's not really considered a best practice > > is that roughly correct? There is something to that way of thinking. Of course the point of this thread is not to re-open the discussion here, but to locate issuesrather to provide a convincing mathematical model that would end the conversation on this topic on a good note, rather than on the exhausted one I think it ended on :-) > > > Henry > > [1] Nick Gibbins told me in the review that he had proposed > a review of the http-range-14 question. Anyone know where > that is? >
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2018 08:35:06 UTC