- From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
- Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 01:05:42 +0200
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <f4421492-7638-fe2e-d37e-ef0c720e89ce@narod.ru>
Sorry, I wanted to say "associated withhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude namespace".
---
I currently have the following RDF associated with
http://portonvictor.org/ns/trans/ namespace:
@prefix : <http://portonvictor.org/ns/trans/> .
@prefix lang: <http://portonvictor.org/ns/trans/scripts/#> .
_:xinclude
a :Transformer ;
:sourceNamespace <http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude> ;
:universal true ;
:inward false ;
#:targetNamespace <...> ;
:precedence :precedence-include ;
:script [
a :Command ;
:language lang:XInclude ;
:transformerKind :entire ;
:preservance 1.0 ;
:stability 1.0 ;
:preference 1.0
] .
Now I want to give specific (non-blank) names to transformers and
script, like this:
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude#transformer>
a :Transformer ;
:sourceNamespace <http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude> ;
:universal true ;
:inward false ;
#:targetNamespace <...> ;
:precedence :precedence-include ;
:script <http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude#transformer-script1> .
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude#transformer-script1>
a :Command ;
:language lang:XInclude ;
:transformerKind :entire ;
:preservance 1.0 ;
:stability 1.0 ;
:preference 1.0 .
My question: is it a good idea to associate URLs of the form
http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude#... with my objects?
I am somehow afraid that in the future makers of XInclude standard may
also want to usehttp://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude#... namespaces and this
may conflict or mess with my node subjects.
Received on Saturday, 15 December 2018 23:06:14 UTC