- From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
- Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 01:05:42 +0200
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <f4421492-7638-fe2e-d37e-ef0c720e89ce@narod.ru>
Sorry, I wanted to say "associated withhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude namespace". --- I currently have the following RDF associated with http://portonvictor.org/ns/trans/ namespace: @prefix : <http://portonvictor.org/ns/trans/> . @prefix lang: <http://portonvictor.org/ns/trans/scripts/#> . _:xinclude a :Transformer ; :sourceNamespace <http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude> ; :universal true ; :inward false ; #:targetNamespace <...> ; :precedence :precedence-include ; :script [ a :Command ; :language lang:XInclude ; :transformerKind :entire ; :preservance 1.0 ; :stability 1.0 ; :preference 1.0 ] . Now I want to give specific (non-blank) names to transformers and script, like this: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude#transformer> a :Transformer ; :sourceNamespace <http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude> ; :universal true ; :inward false ; #:targetNamespace <...> ; :precedence :precedence-include ; :script <http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude#transformer-script1> . <http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude#transformer-script1> a :Command ; :language lang:XInclude ; :transformerKind :entire ; :preservance 1.0 ; :stability 1.0 ; :preference 1.0 . My question: is it a good idea to associate URLs of the form http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude#... with my objects? I am somehow afraid that in the future makers of XInclude standard may also want to usehttp://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude#... namespaces and this may conflict or mess with my node subjects.
Received on Saturday, 15 December 2018 23:06:14 UTC