Re: Toward easier RDF: a proposal

On 12/10/18 5:34 AM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
> I'd really like to see mandatory persistent blank node identifiers in
> SPARQL - so I can easily do followup queries for blank nodes from a SPARQL
> result. Is this a big deal? I think some triples stores can already do this.
> Which issue do I upvote to get this?

Blank nodes #19:
https://github.com/w3c/EasierRDF/issues/19

David Booth

Received on Monday, 10 December 2018 16:30:50 UTC