Re: Toward easier RDF: a proposal

hi

I really think this is an issue where we might be losing lots of people:

"Oh nice, I got a result - now let's get more info about this blank node. 
 What? I have to repeat the original query? This is sick!"

Regards,

Michael Brunnbauer

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:34:11AM +0100, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
> 
> Hello David,
> 
> I'd really like to see mandatory persistent blank node identifiers in
> SPARQL - so I can easily do followup queries for blank nodes from a SPARQL 
> result. Is this a big deal? I think some triples stores can already do this.
> Which issue do I upvote to get this?
> 
> cu,
> brunni
> 
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 11:56:16PM -0500, David Booth wrote:
> > Thanks to Dave Raggett's help, we have created a github area for this work
> > on making RDF easier to use:
> > https://github.com/w3c/EasierRDF
> > 
> > I have transferred all of the notes that I collected from the google doc
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/12cPE-oi90bd
> > e1phn0H0_tJQzYAJ7gD1mQl13H0Lo694/edit#
> > which is now obsolete.  I have created corresponding issues on the issues
> > list:
> > https://github.com/w3c/EasierRDF/issues
> > I have also added labels to the issues in order to categorize them, using
> > the following labels:
> > 
> >   big ideas: for major ideas that span multiple issue categories
> >   tools: for RDF tools
> >   education: for documentation and education
> >   usage: for issues around RDF usage in practice
> >   language features: for language features of RDF itself
> >   related standards: for RDF-related standards
> > 
> > These categories might change if we figure out a better way to organize the
> > topics.  Please send suggestions or make pull requests if you have ideas for
> > better organizing them.
> > 
> > CALL TO ACTION:
> > 
> > Please vote on ~3-5 issues that you think are most important to address for
> > making RDF easier to use:
> > https://github.com/w3c/EasierRDF/issues
> > How to upvote an issue:
> > https://github.com/MechWarriorOnline/issue-tracker/wiki/How-To-Upvote-An-Issue
> > 
> > Further ideas and suggestions are invited!
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > David Booth
> 
> -- 
> ++  Michael Brunnbauer
> ++  netEstate GmbH
> ++  Geisenhausener Straße 11a
> ++  81379 München
> ++  Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80
> ++  Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89 
> ++  E-Mail brunni@netestate.de
> ++  https://www.netestate.de/
> ++
> ++  Sitz: München, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B München)
> ++  USt-IdNr. DE221033342
> ++  Geschäftsführer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer
> ++  Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel



-- 
++  Michael Brunnbauer
++  netEstate GmbH
++  Geisenhausener Straße 11a
++  81379 München
++  Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80
++  Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89 
++  E-Mail brunni@netestate.de
++  https://www.netestate.de/
++
++  Sitz: München, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B München)
++  USt-IdNr. DE221033342
++  Geschäftsführer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer
++  Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel

Received on Monday, 10 December 2018 10:44:12 UTC