- From: <ajs6f@apache.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 09:13:29 -0400
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
+1 It could be a little tricky to find thorough agreement on "and how they complement each other" but that shouldn't block. I would be happy to work on this. As a committer for Apache Jena, I can report that we see plenty of questions on our users@ list that would be well met by a resource like this. --- A. Soroka Research Computing : Office of the CIO : the Smithsonian Institution Melvin Carvalho wrote on 10/12/17 8:23 AM: > > > On 12 October 2017 at 13:51, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com <mailto:martynas@atomgraph.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > after working on a presentation introducing semantic technologies I got this idea. Every main spec (RDF, OWL, > SPARQL) has its own primer/overview, usually with small data examples: > * Bob, Alice and Mona Lisa in RDF 1.1 Primer > * man, woman, Bill and Mary in OWL 2 Primer > * Alice, Bob, Charlie in SPARQL 1.1 Overview > > I think it would be good for W3C to have, especially for beginners, a primer that uses the same data sample, and > then goes through the technologies and explains, with growing complexity, what each of them can do for the data > (infer, query etc.) and how they complement each other. > > So instead of specifications as these vertical isolated pillars, have a document that is focused on data instead and > cuts accross the specifications "horizontally". > > What do you think? > > > +1 > > > > > Martynas > atomgraph.com <http://atomgraph.com> > >
Received on Thursday, 12 October 2017 13:16:23 UTC