Re: Some minor changes on the RDFa context document

On 2017-01-05 15:51, Ivan Herman wrote:
> Two entries have been added to the list of "reserved" prefixes, ie,
> those that may be included into the official vocabulary prefixes. These
> are odrl and as.
> 
> While these have no effect on current implementations and usage of RDFa
> and JSON-LD, be advised that, in the coming 1-2 months, three new
> prefixes may be added to the list:
> 
> oa: Web Annotation vocabulary 
> as: Activity (Streams) vocabulary
> dqv: Data Quality Vocabulary
> 
> The first two are part of planned Recommendations; the third one is
> defined through an (already published) W3C Note. These changes may
> require a minor update on existing RDFa implementations.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Ivan
> 
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C 
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
> 
> 

Great!

How about adding LDP as well:

http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#
https://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/

-Sarven
http://csarven.ca/#i