- From: Paul Houle <ontology2@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 20:33:06 -0400
- To: "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAE__kdRPCi2nZePW=TaPm-Qt3GRMUTzBvSJ1L=RmYobP32g4FQ@mail.gmail.com>
Imagine I have some facts about an instance such as :instance07 :composedOf :Lead . and then I say something like :instance07 :singleValued :composedOf . to distinguish the case of "a single valued property" from "a set of of property values which just happens to have one member". The difference doesn't usually matter in RDF-world but if you have to round trip with Lucene or DynamoDB you can attach supplementary data with the "make a statement about an ?s ?p pair by writing ?s ?p1 ?p" This permits writing :John :hasNo :sibling . This is parallel to how people typically write RDF so it does not get in the way, but it queries just fine with SPARQL, Jena Rules and such. Is there a name for this trick? -- Paul Houle (607) 539 6254 paul.houle on Skype ontology2@gmail.com Ontology2 Edition of DBpedia 2015-10 https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B01HMUNH4Q/ <http://basekb.com/gold/> http://ontology2.com/the-book/o2dbpedia-info.html http://ontology2.com/book/chapter2/part1/dbpedia-examples.html RDF: A new Slant http://ontology2.com/the-book/rdf-a-new-slant.html <https://www.linkedin.com/grp/home?gid=8267275> Data Lakes, Data Ponds, and Data Droplets http://ontology2.com/the-book/data-lakes-ponds-and-droplets.html
Received on Sunday, 4 September 2016 00:33:38 UTC