Re: Call for position statements "PROV: Three Years Later"

Hi Sarven,

Any format is fine (html, pdf, pptx, .... ). We're just interested in
contributions so we can have a good discussion with people using and
working with provenance and PROV. It'll all be posted to the web.

Just trying to encourage people to use HTML. RASH is pretty simple so a
pointer seemed reasonable.

No requirement

Paul









On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote:

> On 2016-03-26 14:23, Paul Groth wrote:
>
>> To facilitate publication on the Web, authors are encouraged to submit
>> documents in HTML, using the RASH framework
>> <https://github.com/essepuntato/rash> (Research Articles in Simplified
>> HTML). Mutliple submissions for different experiences and/or
>> requirements are welcome. As we are keen to gather as many experiences
>> and requirements as possible, it is acceptable for authors to submit
>> position statements, even if they cannot physically attend the workshop,
>> as long as they inform the organizers.
>>
>
> @philarcher1 @w3c Why "..encouraged to submit documents in HTML, using the
> RASH framework"? Why favoritism? Why not "HTML" full stop?
>
> https://twitter.com/csarven/status/710510400589041664
>
> @philarcher1 @w3c Explicitly asking for an arbitrary subset of HTML isn't
> so different than asking PDF w/ a publisher's authoring guidelines
>
> https://twitter.com/csarven/status/710511988481196032
>
> .@csarven Not my call, I'm afraid (and I agree with you). Profiles of all
> sorts of things are becoming more of an issue for us.
>
> https://twitter.com/philarcher1/status/710523984782237696
>
> -Sarven
> http://csarven.ca/#i
>