Simon,
it's not about files, it's about dynamically constructed RDF datasets with
named graphs, that we want to process with XSLT. More about the use case in
this thread:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2016Jun/0003.html
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 9, 2016 11:55 AM, "Martynas Jusevičius" <martynas@graphity.org>
> wrote:
>
> > we have a use case where we need an RDF format in XML syntax that
>
> Use case, or noose case😉?
>
> Do you need to have "named" blank nodes that cross graph boundaries, and
> can't readily use the 1.1 well known genid trick?
>
> If not, it might be simpler just to stick a name attribute in the RDF/XML
> root element, store each graph in a separate file, collecting the files in
> a tarball or the like? That would allow unmodified software to work with
> the individual graphs.
>
> If needs be you could have an additional file defining the dataset, which
> could be used as the starting document for xsl processing.
>
> Simon
>