On Jun 9, 2016 11:55 AM, "Martynas Jusevičius" <martynas@graphity.org> wrote: > we have a use case where we need an RDF format in XML syntax that Use case, or noose case😉? Do you need to have "named" blank nodes that cross graph boundaries, and can't readily use the 1.1 well known genid trick? If not, it might be simpler just to stick a name attribute in the RDF/XML root element, store each graph in a separate file, collecting the files in a tarball or the like? That would allow unmodified software to work with the individual graphs. If needs be you could have an additional file defining the dataset, which could be used as the starting document for xsl processing. Simon
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2016 17:41:31 UTC