Re: HTML Form to semantic web proposal

That requires people getting people making such forms to learn RDF, which if you 
read the types of answers to issue 11 linked below, or if you interact with IndieWeb folks,
 you'll understand is unlikely.  What is less unlikely is that the server provide a link
to an interpretation. The interpretation can then be made machine readable in the way 
proposed.

> On 26 Nov 2015, at 18:47, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org> wrote:
> 
> Can't you reuse RDF/POST for that?
> http://www.lsrn.org/semweb/rdfpost.html <http://www.lsrn.org/semweb/rdfpost.html>
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 at 19:38, henry.story@bblfish.net <mailto:henry.story@bblfish.net> <henry.story@bblfish.net <mailto:henry.story@bblfish.net>> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>    following a discussion with the IndieWeb folks on a pingback protocol,
> where we are trying to satisfy the constraints that the IndieWeb folks live
> by - which is very close to the first generation of the Web - and yet who
> want to work in a global web of data - the following requirement came
> up: how can a resource make explicit its interpretation of web forms.
> 
> I write this up here:
>   https://github.com/w3c-social/webmention/issues/11 <https://github.com/w3c-social/webmention/issues/11>
> 
> Essentially this would not entail very much other than creating a Link realation
> that could point to something like a document that would contain a mapping
> that could look like this
> 
> [[
> @prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/>>.
> @prefix contact: <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/contact# <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/contact#>> .
> 
> CONSTRUCT {
> []  foaf:name ?name;
>     foaf:age ?age;
>     contact:home
>             [ a contact:ContactLocation;
>                 contact:address [ contact:city ?city;
>                                   contact:country ?country;
>                                   contact:postalCode ?zip;
>                                   contact:street ?street
>                                 ] .
> } WITH ?name ?age ?city ?country ?zip ?street
> ]]
> 
> where ?name ?age ?city etc would be the values of the properties taken from the
> application/x-www-form-urlencoded content sent in a POST.
> 
> This should not be that much work to specify I suppose, especially for the SPARQL knowledgeable folks.
> 
> Any feedback?
> 
>         Henry
> 
> 
> 
>