- From: <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 12:06:20 +0200
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@aistemos.com>
- Cc: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, ahogan@dcc.uchile.cl, semantic-web@w3.org
> On 21 May 2015, at 10:08, Steve Harris <steve.harris@aistemos.com> wrote: > > >>> Alternatively, some SPARQL servers may use >>> stable internal identifiers that could serve this purpose (still >>> requiring normative normalization), but I suspect that there are some >>> implementations that don’t guarantee such stable identifiers). >> >> Right, it would involve enhancing SPARQL servers. > > Quite a few can do this already, and there’s a syntax sanctioned by RDF 1.1 > > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-skolemization yes, except that skolemization using .well-konwn URLs is ugly, broken, and should never have made it into RDF1.1 spec. It breaks linked data clients that need to analyse the full uri for .wellknown urls before deciding wether to follow them. it would be better to have coined bnode URNs of some form. I made a suggestion along those lines at some point. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2014Sep/0088.html Henry Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2015 10:06:54 UTC