- From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:47:55 -0500
- To: Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>
- Cc: Semantic Web IG <semantic-web@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Message-ID: <CAGR+nnGf-=y-2VwRUMWch7Dktjc6jfMQ3swuZsWEb0LN0NmheA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org> wrote: > Dan, > > IIRC you asked a while back on this list about the semantics associated > with two URIs that differ only in the presence/absence of a trailing slash. > I've been spending some time looking at the RDF available for ORCIDs > recently, for example [1]. It's difficult to spot but in fact they use a > URI like http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 to refer to a person (in > this case Ivan Herman) and the same URI with a trailing slash to refer to > his online account. > > Clearly these two URIs *are* different and are being used consistently to > distinguish between a real world object and its description, but, by > convention, do you think the difference is sufficient to be regarded as > 'safe?' Is orcid.org following good practice here? > > FWIW, no, one URI does not redirect to the other. > This might differ depending on the web server, or the version of a given web server, some might redirect from one to the other, some might not. From a human standpoint, visually speaking when looking at the URI, I don't find the difference very obvious. For those reasons, I don't think it's a good or safe way to disambiguate between a real world object and its description. Steph. > > WDYT? > > Phil. > > [1] http://i-sieve.com/cgi-bin/HTTP_Headers.cgi?url=http%3A% > 2F%2Forcid.org%2F0000-0003-0782-2704&UA=ttl&get=on > > -- > > Phil Archer > http://philarcher.org/ > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1 > > -- Steph.
Received on Friday, 6 March 2015 18:48:26 UTC