- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 09:58:13 +0300
- To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Satrajit Ghosh <satra@mit.edu>
Eric,
there's an URI service for media types, not sure if it helps:
http://mediatypes.appspot.com
Martynas
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote:
> Is there a mapping from media type (e.g. application/json) to RDF
> literal datatype? In this use case, the data is specifically JSON
> embedded in a literal rather than an RDF graph representable as
> JSON-LD, e.g.
> :id :prop "{ \"a\": [1, 2, 3]}"^^rdtype:json
> where rdtype is some spec which maps
> application/json => "json"
> text/csv => "csv"
>
> Maybe the right thing to do is say that everything in column 1 of
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml#application
> is an rdtype local name. That would render ambiguous the backward
> mapping for media types in e.g. both an app/ and a text/ trees, but
> I don't know that there's much use in knowing whether anything in
> this list is app/ vs. text/:
>
> 1d-interleaved-parityfec
> activemessage
> dns
> ecmascript
> encaprtp
> example
> javascript
> parityfec
> raptorfec
> rtf
> rtploopback
> rtx
> ulpfec
> vnd.curl
> xml-external-parsed-entity
>
> If there is a usefull difference, we could have different prefixes for
> the different trees: application, audio, example, image, message,
> model, multipart, text, video, and prefix declarations can call them
> e.g. "rdapp", "rdaudio"...
>
> --
> -ericP
>
> office: +1.617.599.3509
> mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59
>
> (eric@w3.org)
> Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
> email address distribution.
>
> There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
> which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
>
Received on Saturday, 11 April 2015 06:58:40 UTC