- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 09:58:13 +0300
- To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Satrajit Ghosh <satra@mit.edu>
Eric, there's an URI service for media types, not sure if it helps: http://mediatypes.appspot.com Martynas On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote: > Is there a mapping from media type (e.g. application/json) to RDF > literal datatype? In this use case, the data is specifically JSON > embedded in a literal rather than an RDF graph representable as > JSON-LD, e.g. > :id :prop "{ \"a\": [1, 2, 3]}"^^rdtype:json > where rdtype is some spec which maps > application/json => "json" > text/csv => "csv" > > Maybe the right thing to do is say that everything in column 1 of > http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml#application > is an rdtype local name. That would render ambiguous the backward > mapping for media types in e.g. both an app/ and a text/ trees, but > I don't know that there's much use in knowing whether anything in > this list is app/ vs. text/: > > 1d-interleaved-parityfec > activemessage > dns > ecmascript > encaprtp > example > javascript > parityfec > raptorfec > rtf > rtploopback > rtx > ulpfec > vnd.curl > xml-external-parsed-entity > > If there is a usefull difference, we could have different prefixes for > the different trees: application, audio, example, image, message, > model, multipart, text, video, and prefix declarations can call them > e.g. "rdapp", "rdaudio"... > > -- > -ericP > > office: +1.617.599.3509 > mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59 > > (eric@w3.org) > Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than > email address distribution. > > There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout > which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper. >
Received on Saturday, 11 April 2015 06:58:40 UTC