- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 02:48:43 -0400
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
- Cc: Satrajit Ghosh <satra@mit.edu>
Is there a mapping from media type (e.g. application/json) to RDF literal datatype? In this use case, the data is specifically JSON embedded in a literal rather than an RDF graph representable as JSON-LD, e.g. :id :prop "{ \"a\": [1, 2, 3]}"^^rdtype:json where rdtype is some spec which maps application/json => "json" text/csv => "csv" Maybe the right thing to do is say that everything in column 1 of http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml#application is an rdtype local name. That would render ambiguous the backward mapping for media types in e.g. both an app/ and a text/ trees, but I don't know that there's much use in knowing whether anything in this list is app/ vs. text/: 1d-interleaved-parityfec activemessage dns ecmascript encaprtp example javascript parityfec raptorfec rtf rtploopback rtx ulpfec vnd.curl xml-external-parsed-entity If there is a usefull difference, we could have different prefixes for the different trees: application, audio, example, image, message, model, multipart, text, video, and prefix declarations can call them e.g. "rdapp", "rdaudio"... -- -ericP office: +1.617.599.3509 mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59 (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution. There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
Received on Saturday, 11 April 2015 06:48:46 UTC