- From: Jean-Claude Moissinac <jean-claude.moissinac@telecom-paristech.fr>
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 20:23:40 +0200
- To: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>, Fabien Gandon <fabien.gandon@inria.fr>, Mauro Dragoni <dragoni@fbk.eu>, Marta Sabou <marta.sabou@modul.ac.at>, Harald Sack <harald.sack@hpi.uni-potsdam.de>, SW-forum Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAP8HVi3BPhnzBLez8qc1JiEo8+cQvV5FYTr62ms1wu-0pJsAyw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello To follow the proposal of Laura Dawson. I'm working on methods and tools to put and use semantic in ePub. I'm interested to offer support to help the conference organizers and the authors to produce a "semantic" ePub as proceedings of the conference. Best regards -- Jean-Claude Moissinac Associate professor Telecom ParisTech 2014-10-01 19:17 GMT+02:00 Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>: > +1 to Sarven's proposal. > > We have to start 'at home' with improving publication process & output. > Quite frankly, if the experts in linked data don't lead by example and show > the benefits, how / why will conference organizers & publishers change how > they do things. That said, we have to show how more robust data capture > benefits their business model *and* helps researchers [because they can > collaborate more effectively, grant funding goes further & is more > effective, etc]. > > Over time, it will have broader implications in the larger research > community and beyond. That is my 2 cents. > > Cheers, > > Bernadette Hyland > CEO, 3 Round Stones, Inc. > > http://3roundstones.com > http://about.me/bernadettehyland > > > On Oct 1, 2014, at 12:35 PM, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote: > > On 2014-10-01 18:12, Fabien Gandon wrote: > > Dear Saven, > > > Thank your for your response Fabien. > > The scientific articles are presenting scientific achievements in a format > that is suitable for human consumption. > Documents in a portable format remain the best way to do that for a > conference today. > > > I acknowledge the current state of matters for sharing scientific > knowledge. However, the concern was whether ESWC was willing to promote Web > native technologies for sharing knowledge, as opposed to solely insisting > on Adobe's PDF, a desktop native technology. > > If my memory serves me correctly, the Web "took off" not because of PDF, > but due to plain old simple HTML. You know just as well that HTML was > intended for scientific knowledge sharing at large scale, for human as well > as machine consumption. > > However: > - all the metadata of the conference are published as linked data e.g. > http://data.semanticweb.org/conference/eswc/2014/html > > > This is great. But, don't you think that we can and ought to do better > than just metadata? > > - authors are encouraged to publish, the datasets and algorithms they use > in their research on the Web following its standards. > > > I think we all know too well that this is something left as optional that > very few follow-up. There is no reproducibility "police" in SW/LD venues. > Simply put, we can't honestly reproduce the research because all of the > important atomic components that are discussed in the papers e.g., from > hypothesis, variables, to conclusions, are not precisely identified or > easily discoverable. Most of the time, one has to hunt down the authors for > that information. IMHO, this severely limits scientific progress on Web > Science. > > Will you compromise on the submission such that the submissions can be in > PDF and/or in HTML(+RDFa)? > > Thanks again for considering. > > -Sarven > http://csarven.ca/#i > > >
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2014 18:24:28 UTC