- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 12:44:09 -0500
- To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Cc: semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 7 March 2014 17:45:06 UTC
Can you explain what you mean by "RDF's ability to allow multiple data models to peacefully coexist, interconnected, in the same data" ? -Alan On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:20 AM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote: > I -- and I'm sure many others -- have struggled for years trying to > succinctly describe RDF's ability to allow multiple data models to > peacefully coexist, interconnected, in the same data. For data > integration, this is a key strength of RDF that distinguishes it from other > information representation languages such as XML. I have tried various > terms over the years -- most recently "schema promiscuous" -- but have not > yet found one that I think really nails it, so I would love to get other > people's thoughts. > > This google doc lists several candidate terms, some pros and cons, and > allows you to indicate which ones you like best: > http://goo.gl/zrXQgj > > Please have a look and indicate your favorite(s). You may also add more > ideas and comments to it. The document can be edited by anyone with the > URL. > > Thanks! > David Booth > >
Received on Friday, 7 March 2014 17:45:06 UTC