- From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
- Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 19:33:17 +0300
- To: Chockalingam <chockam@gmail.com>
- Cc: "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Any particular reason for this? There is a reason NOT to merge: It makes error discovery easier. But are there reasons to merge? 05.07.2014, 19:32, "Chockalingam" <chockam@gmail.com>: > Dear Victor > > As per my understanding it should be merged and then only it will be complete. > > Regards > Chockalingam > > Sent from my iPhone >> šOn Jul 5, 2014, at 8:37 PM, Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> wrote: >> >> šI work on this project: >> šhttp://freesoft.portonvictor.org/namespaces.xml >> >> šIt involves downloading RDF files from the Web. >> >> šWhen a "bundle" (for lack of a better word), that is a set of related RDF triples, is incomplete it should be ignored. >> >> šMy question, if a bundle is split into several different RDF files, and each part of it is incomplete, should it nevertheless not be ignored if the union of all parts of the bundle is complete? >> >> šA toy example (A, B1, B2, C be namespaces): >> >> šIn one file: >> >> š<A> <B1> <C> . >> >> šIn an other file: >> >> š<A> <B2> <C> . >> >> šIf both B1 and B2 properties are required, should this information be ignored (as incomplete bundles)? or should the information from the two files be merged and thus considered complete? >> >> š-- >> šVictor Porton - http://portonvictor.org -- Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
Received on Saturday, 5 July 2014 17:10:39 UTC