W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > August 2014

Re: Is "syntax" the right word?

From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 00:13:55 +0200
Message-ID: <CAE35VmwUbV89OgvwgYRLttmx3y+zNZDurcC3W0rmFDgQjPBT8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Cc: SW-forum Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Victor,

perhaps you mean "constraints"? See for example:
http://semwebquality.org/ontologies/dq-constraints
http://spinrdf.org/spin.html

Martynas
graphityhq.com

On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> wrote:
> How to call a set of restrictions for an RDF resource?
>
> Examples of restrictions:
>
> "There must be no more than one subject for object http://example.org/obj and predicate http://example.org/pred"
>
> "If object http://example.org/obj has predicate http://example.org/pred it should also have predicate http://example.org/pred2"
>
> Should it be called syntax?
>
> Pro: It denotes syntax as opposed to semantics.
>
> Counter: The word syntax may be reserved for concrete syntaxes such as Turtle or XML.
>
> So, shall we call such a set of restrictions "syntax"? If not, which word to use?
>
> --
> Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
>
Received on Saturday, 23 August 2014 22:14:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:38 UTC