- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:23:45 +0100
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 1 August 2013 21:37, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > This is an important piece of list policy to stick to. Yes. I'd like to reinforce what others have said already, per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010May/0132.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010Jul/0387.html etc this is not an appropriate forum for discussing patents. For W3C spec-track work, there are formal disclosure procedures as part of W3C process; other general discussion of specific patents, the patent system in general, etc., belong elsewhere. cheers, Dan >> If you really need to alert members of this list to such a discussion >> please: >> - start the discussion on some other list >> - send to this list a pointer to your discussion with only the briefest >> indication of what it is about to this list >> >> A helpful message in the earlier thread was this one from Damian, >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010Jul/0387.html >> that includes a pointer to a chair statement: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010May/0132.html >> >> While I understand the interest, with a SWIG chairing hat on, I >> recommend that participants here do not dissect patents and patent >> applications on this list. >> >> >> Until and unless the chair of the SWIG reverses this recommendation, I >> take that to be list policy >> >> Jeremy > > >
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 13:24:12 UTC