- From: KANZAKI Masahide <mkanzaki@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:58:29 +0900
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Cc: SW-forum Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hello Markus, thanks for JSON-LD context. really appreciated. 2013/10/31 Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>: > At the moment it includes also all deprecated elements. I wasn't sure what > to do with them... should we drop them? I don't think we should drop them. Renato, indeed, I'm still not convinced that we should mark them as "deprecated". Many of them are actually used in the wild, and referenced from other vocabularies. E.g. "adr", "url", "label" are some of most used properties in vcard [1], and "Vcard" is normatively referenced by some W3C specifications, e.g. DCAT and ADMS. Why not just suggest in prose text that they have consistently named equivalents, along with equivalentProperty/equivalentClass axioms ? I'd like to quote "consider users over authors over implementors over specifiers over theoretical purity" from HTML Design Principles [2]. cheers, [1] http://stats.lod2.eu/properties?search=vcard [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/html-design-principles/#priority-of-constituencies -- @prefix : <http://www.kanzaki.com/ns/sig#> . <> :from [:name "KANZAKI Masahide"; :nick "masaka"; :email "mkanzaki@gmail.com"].
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2013 12:58:56 UTC