W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > October 2013

RE: vCard Ontology WD Updated

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 21:07:06 +0200
To: "'Renato Iannella'" <ri@semanticidentity.com>
Cc: <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-ID: <015a01cecf59$e75e02a0$b61a07e0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
Hi Renato,

On Monday, September 30, 2013 6:05 AM, Renato Iannella wrote:
> > I think it would also make sense to define and host a context (maybe at
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/context.jsonld) so that all people would
need
> > to do to mark up vCards in JSON-LD is to reference it. This could then
also
> > include type-coercions to @id for hasEmail e.g. so that you don't need
those
> > ugly @id-constructs anymore. I would volunteer to write it if you want.
> 
> 
> Ok...Volunteering accepted ;-)

I've started to work on this today and noticed that the ontology is somewhat
inconsistent in regard to strings. In some cases you language-tag them (e.g.
vcard:adr's rdfs:label), in some you don't (e.g. vcard:adr's rdfs:comment),
and in other you type them as xsd:string (e.g. vcard:Home's rdfs:label). I
think it would make sense to consolidate all of them to language-tagged
strings or is there are reason for the current state?

Thanks,
Markus


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2013 19:07:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:35 UTC