- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 21:07:06 +0200
- To: "'Renato Iannella'" <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Cc: <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hi Renato, On Monday, September 30, 2013 6:05 AM, Renato Iannella wrote: > > I think it would also make sense to define and host a context (maybe at > > http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/context.jsonld) so that all people would need > > to do to mark up vCards in JSON-LD is to reference it. This could then also > > include type-coercions to @id for hasEmail e.g. so that you don't need those > > ugly @id-constructs anymore. I would volunteer to write it if you want. > > > Ok...Volunteering accepted ;-) I've started to work on this today and noticed that the ontology is somewhat inconsistent in regard to strings. In some cases you language-tag them (e.g. vcard:adr's rdfs:label), in some you don't (e.g. vcard:adr's rdfs:comment), and in other you type them as xsd:string (e.g. vcard:Home's rdfs:label). I think it would make sense to consolidate all of them to language-tagged strings or is there are reason for the current state? Thanks, Markus -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2013 19:07:38 UTC