- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 21:36:09 -0500
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
On 2013-11 -29, at 06:18, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 29/11/13 09:04, Dan Brickley wrote: >> Whatever we do, let's do it in RDFa this time. Humans are at least as >> important consumers of schemas as computers. >> >> FWIW I think some of the adoption we saw back with the FOAF work >> (apart from being there early) came from having namespace URIs >> de-reference to (more or less) human readable documentation. Far too >> many schema URIs point at a ridiculously unreadable XML file that just >> gets saved to disk and can't be opened with any useful tooling. > > Use content negotiation. Make at least HTML, RDFa, Turtle, JSON-LD available. Yes, content negotiation, with Turtle, JSON-LD, HTML (with RDFa embedded automatically for those who like it), and RDF/XML for historical engines. I very strongly support adding multilingual labels for the core ontologies as soon as we can. Tim > > Andy > >
Received on Saturday, 30 November 2013 02:36:15 UTC