- From: KANZAKI Masahide <mkanzaki@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:09:34 +0900
- To: SW-forum Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
+1 RDFa documents return text/html (or application/xhtml+xml) which is very hard to use (almost useless) for most RDF tools. RDF namespace documents should be served with native RDF media type, at least via content negotiation, IMHO. 2013/11/29 Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>: > > > On 29/11/13 09:04, Dan Brickley wrote: >> >> Whatever we do, let's do it in RDFa this time. Humans are at least as >> important consumers of schemas as computers. >> >> FWIW I think some of the adoption we saw back with the FOAF work >> (apart from being there early) came from having namespace URIs >> de-reference to (more or less) human readable documentation. Far too >> many schema URIs point at a ridiculously unreadable XML file that just >> gets saved to disk and can't be opened with any useful tooling. > > > Use content negotiation. Make at least HTML, RDFa, Turtle, JSON-LD > available. > > Andy > -- @prefix : <http://www.kanzaki.com/ns/sig#> . <> :from [:name "KANZAKI Masahide"; :nick "masaka"; :email "mkanzaki@gmail.com"].
Received on Saturday, 30 November 2013 02:10:02 UTC