Re: Deprecate http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# in favour of /ns/rdf# ??

+1

RDFa documents return text/html (or application/xhtml+xml) which is
very hard to use (almost useless) for most RDF tools. RDF namespace
documents should be served with native RDF media type, at least via
content negotiation, IMHO.


2013/11/29 Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>:
>
>
> On 29/11/13 09:04, Dan Brickley wrote:
>>
>> Whatever we do, let's do it in RDFa this time. Humans are at least as
>> important consumers of schemas as computers.
>>
>> FWIW I think some of the adoption we saw back with the FOAF work
>> (apart from being there early) came from having namespace URIs
>> de-reference to (more or less) human readable documentation. Far too
>> many schema URIs point at a ridiculously unreadable XML file that just
>> gets saved to disk and can't be opened with any useful tooling.
>
>
> Use content negotiation.  Make at least HTML, RDFa, Turtle, JSON-LD
> available.
>
>         Andy
>



-- 
@prefix : <http://www.kanzaki.com/ns/sig#> . <> :from [:name
"KANZAKI Masahide"; :nick "masaka"; :email "mkanzaki@gmail.com"].

Received on Saturday, 30 November 2013 02:10:02 UTC