Re: Is science on sale this week?

the question is simple. both, eswc and iswc are prominent conferences
because of a serious review process, a well structured set of
committees working hard at the time of organization... but most of
all, because we the community have accepted both conferences to be
important. this will not change. so my point is, are publishers
contributing with money,  serious money, to the organization of the
conferences? how are they buying and how are we selling the
publication rights? If tomorrow there were no springer how much would
that affect the finances of eswc and iswc? substantially? why not
enforcing an open publication policy for iswc and eswc? why not
selling publication rights as a bidding process?

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Rowe, Matthew <m.rowe@lancaster.ac.uk> wrote:
> As authors of accepted papers, don't we have the right to disseminate our work as a pre-prints anyway? I just put mine online anyway, and always have done (and will do) for people to download and read.
>
> Matthew
>
> On 14 May 2013, at 10:12, Phillip Lord wrote:
>
>>
>> ISWC and ESWC are a particular problem because they are both Springer. I
>> pulled my paper from publication last year, as they would not do an open
>> access option.
>>
>> So, with the situation as it stands, I cannot publish any semantic web
>> research in either of these two conferences.
>>
>> Phil
>>
>> Alexander Garcia Castro <alexgarciac@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> conferences are important on their own. for instance, right now the
>>> ISWC is an important conference regardless of the publisher of the
>>> proceedings. if I wanted to get the 2012 proceedings I may have to pay
>>> (http://www.springer.com/computer/ai/book/978-3-642-35172-3). do
>>> publishers pay the ISWC organizers for the right to publish the
>>> proceedings? I mean, as things are now the ISWC brings people to
>>> springer, not the other way around.
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Leon Derczynski <leon@dcs.shef.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>> Reliable dissemination.
>>>>
>>>> CEUR-WS, ACL Anthology et al. do a valuable, critical job.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 13 May 2013 17:25, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>> If we subscribe to science, free and open access to knowledge, what's the
>>>>> purpose of the arrangement between conferences and publishers?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Sarven
>>>>> http://csarven.ca/#i
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Leon R A Derczynski
>>>> Research Associate, NLP Group
>>>>
>>>> Department of Computer Science
>>>> University of Sheffield
>>>> Regent Court, 211 Portobello
>>>> Sheffield S1 4DP, UK
>>>>
>>>> +45 5157 4948
>>>> http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~leon/
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>>> "Beyond the PDF" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>>> email to beyond-the-pdf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alexander Garcia
>>> http://www.alexandergarcia.name/
>>> http://www.usefilm.com/photographer/75943.html
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexgarciac
>>
>> --
>> Phillip Lord,                           Phone: +44 (0) 191 222 7827
>> Lecturer in Bioinformatics,             Email: phillip.lord@newcastle.ac.uk
>> School of Computing Science,            http://homepages.cs.ncl.ac.uk/phillip.lord
>> Room 914 Claremont Tower,               skype: russet_apples
>> Newcastle University,                   twitter: phillord
>> NE1 7RU
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beyond the PDF" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beyond-the-pdf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>



-- 
Alexander Garcia
http://www.alexandergarcia.name/
http://www.usefilm.com/photographer/75943.html
http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexgarciac

Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2013 09:25:20 UTC