- From: Peter Boncz <P.Boncz@cwi.nl>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 22:44:19 +0200 (CEST)
- To: "'Jeremy J Carroll'" <jjc@syapse.com>, <semantic-web@w3.org>
Dear Jeremy, This is a very good question, without - regrettably - a good answer. Our benchmarking exercise initially focused in getting the Business Intelligence use case tested. When we started, this was a challenges as this had not been achieved yet. For completeness, we ran also the explore workload, but forgot about explore+update. We plan to rerun the benchmark this fall, we will actually try to scale up to 500 billion triples. At that moment, we will also run the explore+update. Thanks, Peter Boncz -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy J Carroll [mailto:jjc@syapse.com] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 7:12 PM To: semantic-web@w3.org Subject: BUBM: explore and update Hi I have been looking at BUBM as a guide to a triple store decision, and I have been concentrating on the recent V7 version http://wifo5-03.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/bizer/berlinsparqlbenchmark/res ults/V7 I note that the older (out of date) V6, has a section that is missing from V7 http://wifo5-03.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/bizer/berlinsparqlbenchmark/res ults/V6/#resultsExploreAndUpdate which seems to better reflect our intended usage pattern Anyone have any insight into: why this mix was not run in V7 and/or how the triple stores fare with a mix between update and queries Jeremy Principal Architect Syapse, Inc. ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.3345 / Virus Database: 3199/6404 - Release Date: 06/12/13
Received on Friday, 14 June 2013 14:06:51 UTC