Re: annotations and RDF

Thanks to you both.  Tweak away to get this right! David

On 12/02/2013 17:44, Paolo Ciccarese wrote:
> Dear David,
> in general we have not been focusing enough on these aspects yet.
> However, that is one of the top items in the priority list and it 
> would be great if you could participate to the discussion.
>
> As Rob pointed out, with very few tweaks your example could work in 
> compliance with OA as well.
>
> Best,
> Paolo
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Dr David Shotton 
> <david.shotton@zoo.ox.ac.uk <mailto:david.shotton@zoo.ox.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
>
>     On 07/02/2013 14:54, Paolo Ciccarese wrote:
>>     We also use CiTO and FaBIO for storing the bibliographic data and
>>     those are based on FRBR. 
>     Dear Paolo, Robert and Herbert,
>
>     I'm in Leiden at a conference with Bob Morris.  We've just had a
>     brief discussion about the potential use of AO to characterize
>     citations, where the generic CiTO terms don't provide sufficient
>     expressiveness.  That has prompted me to look at the new Open
>     Annotation Data Model: Open Annotation Core
>     <http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/20130208/core.html>
>     published last Friday.
>
>     That document says "Typically an Annotation has a single Body,
>     which is the comment or other descriptive resource, and a single
>     Target that the Body is somehow "about". " Thus oa:hasBody defines
>     the annotation itself, and oa:hasTarget defines the target of that
>     annotation.
>
>     If we now apply that to the situation of a bibliographic citation
>     that we want to characterize with a new annotation, we must be
>     careful to note that oa:hasTarget does NOT apply to the cited
>     paper, but rather to the citation that exists between the citing
>     paper and the cited paper.
>
>     So we first need to define the annotation as applying to the
>     citation, then to define the body of the annotation as something
>     distinct from the citing paper, and finally to define the target
>     of the annotation as the citation itself. What do people think
>     about the following, that uses a Named Graph to define the
>     citation?  Comments welcome!
>
>     Kind regards,
>
>     David
>
>     :citationAnnotation a oa:Annotation ;
>
>     oa:hasBody :CommentOnCitation ;
>
>     oa:hasTarget :citationNamedGraph ;
>
>     oa:motivatedBy oa:commenting .
>
>     :CommentOnCitation a fabio:Comment ;
>
>     dcterms:description "I'm citing that paper because it initiated
>     this whole field of research".
>
>     :citationNamedGraph {
>
>     <Paper_A> cito:cites<Paper_B> .
>
>     }
>
>
>     -- 
>
>     Dr David Shotton
>     Research Data Management and Semantic Publishing Research Group
>     Department of Zoology, University of Oxford
>     South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.
>     Phone:+44-(0)1865-271193  <tel:%2B44-%280%291865-271193>     Skype: davidshotton
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Dr. Paolo Ciccarese
> http://www.paolociccarese.info/
> Biomedical Informatics Research & Development
> Instructor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School
> Assistant in Neuroscience at Mass General Hospital
> Member of the MGH Biomedical Informatics Core
> +1-857-366-1524 (mobile)   +1-617-768-8744 (office)
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the 
> addressee(s), may contain information that is considered
> to be sensitive or confidential and may not be forwarded or disclosed 
> to any other party without the permission of the sender.
> If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender 
> immediately.

-- 

Dr David Shotton
Research Data Management and Semantic Publishing Research Group
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford
South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.
Phone: +44-(0)1865-271193    Skype: davidshotton