- From: Sebastian Hellmann <hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:01:19 +0200
- To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@fi.upm.es>
- CC: Prateek <prateek@knoesis.org>, "semantic-web@w3.org Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <51750A6F.5080209@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
Hm, no actually, this issue is quite easy, when it comes to large databases. curl -H "Accept: text/turtle" "http://dbpedia.org/ontology#PopulatedPlace" is pretty much the same as: curl -H "Accept: text/turtle" "http://dbpedia.org/ontology" So my questions are: 1. What do you think is the expected output of http://dbpedia.org/ontology ? 300 million triples as turtle? 2. How do you query all instances of type db-ont:PopulatedPlace via Linked Data ? q.e.d from my point of view, as you wouldn't get around these practical problems. -- Sebastian Am 22.04.2013 11:50, schrieb Daniel Garijo: > Dear Sebastian, > This statement: > "When you publish ontologies without data, you can use '#' . However, > if you want to query instances via Linked Data in a database, you have > to use '/' as DBpedia does for classes: > http://dbpedia.org/ontology/PopulatedPlace" > > is not correct. You can use "#" to query instances via Linked Data > databases. That is just the URI of the type. In fact if DBpedia had > chosen > > "http://dbpedia.org/ontology#PopulatedPlace > <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/PopulatedPlace>" instead of its current > URI it would still be fine. It doesn't affect the query. > > I'm not going to enter in the debate of "# vs /", but normally it is a > design decission that has to do more with the size of vocabularies > than the > instances. > > Best, > Daniel > > > > 2013/4/22 Sebastian Hellmann <hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de > <mailto:hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>> > > Dear all, > > personally, I have been working on this for quite a while and for > me the best and easiest way is as documented here: > https://github.com/NLP2RDF/persistence.uni-leipzig.org#readme > > They are simple and effective and I couldn't imagine anything more. > > Note that I have also secured persistent hosting for the URIs > (also an important point). > Feedback welcome, of course. > > All the best, > Sebastian > > > Ontology: > http://persistence.uni-leipzig.org/nlp2rdf/ontologies/nif-core# > > > # vs / > > When you publish ontologies without data, you can use '#' . > However, if you want to query instances via Linked Data in a > database, you have to use '/' as DBpedia does for classes: > http://dbpedia.org/ontology/PopulatedPlace > > > <https://github.com/NLP2RDF/persistence.uni-leipzig.org#workflow>Workflow > > 1. I edit the ontologies in turtle syntax with the Geany text > editor (or a Turtle editor > http://blog.aksw.org/2013/xturtle-turtle-editing-the-eclipse-way > ), This allows me to make developers comments using "#" > directly in the source, see e.g. nlp2rdf/ontologies/nif-core.ttl > 2. When I am finished I use rapper > (http://librdf.org/raptor/rapper.html) to convert it to rdfxml > ( nlp2rdf/ontologies/nif-core.owl ) > 3. I am versioning the ontologies in a folder with the version > number, e.g. version-1.0 If somebody wants to find old > ontologies, she can find them in the GitHub repository, which > is linked from the ontology. I assume this is not often > required, but it is nice to keep old versions. The old > versions should be linked to in the comment of the ontology, > see the header of nif-core.ttl > 4. Then I use git push to push the changes to our server > 5. (not yet) I use a simple OWL2HTML generator, e.g. > https://github.com/specgen/specgen > 6. add yourself to http://prefix.cc, see e.g. http://prefix.cc/nif > 7. The versions are switched and published by these .htaccess > rules, e.g. || > |RewriteRule .(owl|rdf|html|ttl|nt|txt|md)$ - [L] > # (in progress) RewriteCond %{HTTP_ACCEPT} text/html > # (in progress) RewriteRule ^nif-core$ > /nlp2rdf/ontologies/nif-core/version-1.0/nif-core.html [R=303,L] > > RewriteCond %{HTTP_ACCEPT} application/rdf+xml > RewriteRule ^nif-core$ > /nlp2rdf/ontologies/nif-core/version-1.0/nif-core.owl [R=303,L] > > RewriteRule ^nif-core$ > /nlp2rdf/ontologies/nif-core/version-1.0/nif-core.ttl [R=303,L]| > > > > > > > Am 19.04.2013 16:05, schrieb Prateek: >> Hello all, >> >> I am trying to identify a system which will provide versioning >> and revision control capabilities specifically for ontologies. >> Does anyone have any experience and idea about which systems can >> help out or if systems like SVN, CVS can do the job? >> >> Regards >> >> Prateek >> >> -- >> >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >> Prateek Jain, Ph. D. >> RSM >> IBM T.J. Watson Research Center >> 1101 Kitchawan Road, 37-244 >> Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 >> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/prateekj >> > > > -- > Dipl. Inf. Sebastian Hellmann > Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig > Projects: http://nlp2rdf.org , http://linguistics.okfn.org , > http://dbpedia.org/Wiktionary , http://dbpedia.org > Homepage: http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/SebastianHellmann > Research Group: http://aksw.org > > -- Dipl. Inf. Sebastian Hellmann Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig Projects: http://nlp2rdf.org , http://linguistics.okfn.org , http://dbpedia.org/Wiktionary , http://dbpedia.org Homepage: http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/SebastianHellmann Research Group: http://aksw.org
Received on Monday, 22 April 2013 10:01:53 UTC