- From: Enrique Pérez Arnaud <enriquepablo@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 23:09:21 +0200
- To: Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de>
- Cc: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
Received on Sunday, 13 May 2012 21:10:10 UTC
Hi, 2012/5/11 Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de> > I was thinking about how to choose promising triples for reasoning over > vast > amounts of data in order to avoid problems with computational complexity. > Any reasoning software necessarily defines validity. Not what is and what is not true, but what kind of information may or may not be true, and what would also be true if what may be true is so. Would not PageRank compromise the validity of the reasoning software that had to analyze its results? I mean, for human searches PageRank may be reasonable, but is it so for logical searches? -- Enrique Pérez Arnaud enriquepablo@gmail.com
Received on Sunday, 13 May 2012 21:10:10 UTC