- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:57:12 +0100
- To: gouadjed@eoweo.com
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
On 12 March 2012 15:45, Ghalem Ouadjed (EOWEO) <gouadjed@eoweo.com> wrote: > Hi > so do i. Working also on this kind of project but with a french language > strong restriction area and i will not explain why so there...:) > I think a wiki could be a nice method but why not a drupal content solution? Re wiki, SWIG members (that's us...) are welcome to use W3C's main Wiki, http://www.w3.org/wiki/ In fact, it evolved from the old ESW that we set up during the original SWAD-Europe and SWAD projects, ages ago. So you'll find a lot of SemWeb notes in there already. For more recent example, the Web Schemas Task Force wiki pages are all in there, see http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas and nearby. It's quite a nice system --- you can use hierarchical URLs to keep things together, and mediawiki templates. In recent weeks I've been using http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/SchemaDotOrgProposals to keep track of proposals for schema.org that are being discussed over in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/ As part of this, we got an extension added to the wiki for posting markup examples; e.g. see http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Singularity#RDFa_impact ... this is really handy! Also templates are quite easy and let you create simple mini-sites. For each Wiki entry that is about a schema.org proposal, I put this in the top of the page: {{Template:SchemaDotOrgProposal|name=Singularity|status=Accepted}} ...this imports markup and fills out the template based on the content in http://www.w3.org/wiki/Template:SchemaDotOrgProposal In this particular case, the template text is: <div style="background-color: #FADADD; color: #000; padding: 3px;">''This is a [[WebSchemas]] proposal '{{{name}}}' for [http://schema.org/ schema.org]. See [[WebSchemas/SchemaDotOrgProposals|Proposals listing]] for more. Status: {{{status}}}''</div> [[Category:WebSchemas]] [[Category:WebSchemaProposals]] <br/> ...this should be reasonably self-explanatory: parameters contain values like 'name', 'status'. And the template also adds some relevant categories too. I've nothing against Drupal, but there's a lot to be said for keeping notes close to other relate discussions, and a Wiki (especially an area of a larger wiki rather than a separate installation) has many benefits there. Hope this helps, cheers, Dan
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 14:57:41 UTC