- From: Paul Hermans <paul@proxml.be>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 08:57:19 +0200
- To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Cc: semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
David,
See
http://blog.swirrl.com/articles/new-publishmydata-feature-named-queries
Paul
On 01 Jun 2012, at 03:45, David Booth wrote:
> [Resending, as my previous message never showed up.]
>
> I would like to be able to write something like this:
>
> SELECT ?s
> WHERE { ?s a ${CLASS} . }
>
> and have ${CLASS} substituted in from an environment variable or other
> parameter, but SPARQL does not currently provide anything like this, and
> it's clearly beyond what the working group could put in SPARQL 1.1.
> So I'm wondering . . .
>
> What have others been using as a template language for SPARQL?
>
> I know TopQuadrant uses an RDF representation for SPARQL CONSTRUCT
> queries in conjunction with SPIN,
> http://www.w3.org/Submission/2011/02/
> but it shreds the SPARQL query into tiny RDF pieces, which is rather
> unfriendly for a human to read. It would be much nicer to have
> something like the above.
>
> How are others handling the need to parameterize their SPARQL queries
> like this?
>
>
>
> --
> David Booth, Ph.D.
> http://dbooth.org/
>
> Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
> reflect those of his employer.
>
>
Kind Regards,
Paul Hermans
-------------------------
ProXML bvba
XML and OWL/RDF services
(w) www.proxml.be
(b) experiences and opinions
(e) paul@proxml.be
(t) +32 15 23 00 76
(m) +32 473 66 03 20
Narcisweg 17
3140 Keerbergen
Belgium
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 06:57:53 UTC