- From: Paul Hermans <paul@proxml.be>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 08:57:19 +0200
- To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Cc: semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
David, See http://blog.swirrl.com/articles/new-publishmydata-feature-named-queries Paul On 01 Jun 2012, at 03:45, David Booth wrote: > [Resending, as my previous message never showed up.] > > I would like to be able to write something like this: > > SELECT ?s > WHERE { ?s a ${CLASS} . } > > and have ${CLASS} substituted in from an environment variable or other > parameter, but SPARQL does not currently provide anything like this, and > it's clearly beyond what the working group could put in SPARQL 1.1. > So I'm wondering . . . > > What have others been using as a template language for SPARQL? > > I know TopQuadrant uses an RDF representation for SPARQL CONSTRUCT > queries in conjunction with SPIN, > http://www.w3.org/Submission/2011/02/ > but it shreds the SPARQL query into tiny RDF pieces, which is rather > unfriendly for a human to read. It would be much nicer to have > something like the above. > > How are others handling the need to parameterize their SPARQL queries > like this? > > > > -- > David Booth, Ph.D. > http://dbooth.org/ > > Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily > reflect those of his employer. > > Kind Regards, Paul Hermans ------------------------- ProXML bvba XML and OWL/RDF services (w) www.proxml.be (b) experiences and opinions (e) paul@proxml.be (t) +32 15 23 00 76 (m) +32 473 66 03 20 Narcisweg 17 3140 Keerbergen Belgium
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 06:57:53 UTC