Re: OWL equivalentClass question

Am 15.07.2012 12:03, schrieb Bijan Parsia:
> On 15 Jul 2012, at 10:58, Bijan Parsia wrote:
>
>> Oh, for example,
>>
>> Skolemization:
>> 	Blah blah blah definition blah blah balh.
>> 	Note: Many applications and specifications rely on non-skolemized graphs. The skolemization operation almost certainly will break these, causing rejection of the skolemized graph or unanticipated results. Skolemization should be regarded as a destructive operation.
>
> Oh, screw me! Insidious weasally specese!
>
> "Skolemizatin IS a destructive operation and will change the meaning of your graphs. It's useful, but if you don't know what you're doing don't come crying to us that your data is a mess."

"Instead, the right person to be blamed and to take all legal actions 
against will be your friendly tool provider!" ;-)

Cheers,
Michael

-- 
.........................................................
Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider
Research Scientist, IPE / WIM

FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik
Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10–14
76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Tel.: +49 721 9654-726
Fax: +49 721 9654-727

michael.schneider@fzi.de
www.fzi.de

.........................................................
Forschungszentrum Informatik (FZI) an der Universität Karlsruhe
Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Stiftung Az: 14-0563.1 Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe
Vorstand: Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael Flor, Prof. Dr. Ralf Reussner,
Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer, Prof. Dr.-Ing. J. Marius Zöllner
Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus
.........................................................

Received on Sunday, 15 July 2012 12:22:30 UTC