- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 11:03:05 +0100
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, semantic-web@w3.org, nathan@webr3.org, W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 15 Jul 2012, at 10:58, Bijan Parsia wrote: > Oh, for example, > > Skolemization: > Blah blah blah definition blah blah balh. > Note: Many applications and specifications rely on non-skolemized graphs. The skolemization operation almost certainly will break these, causing rejection of the skolemized graph or unanticipated results. Skolemization should be regarded as a destructive operation. Oh, screw me! Insidious weasally specese! "Skolemizatin IS a destructive operation and will change the meaning of your graphs. It's useful, but if you don't know what you're doing don't come crying to us that your data is a mess." :) Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Sunday, 15 July 2012 10:03:29 UTC