W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Intranet ontology?

From: Bob Ferris <zazi@smiy.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:26:25 +0100
Message-ID: <4F437F61.40101@smiy.org>
To: semantic-web@w3.org
Hi Alexander,

finally, if you are really not happy with the various available and 
suggested ontologies out there, you could of course build your own 
ontology of your intended application domain, publish it, and I guess 
there are other interested persons out there who could assist you by 
(mainly) mapping your ontology terms back to appropriated existing ones.

Cheers,


Bo


PS: Intranet domain sounds a bit strange in my mind - (as already 
suggested) enterprise/business domain might be a bit more appropriated, 
or? So maybe you simply searched for the wrong terms, which is not 
really your fault, because finding appropriated ontologies is still a 
huge problem. Although, the situation there is getting better and better 
in the last times (see LOV, schemapedia, ...)



On 2/21/2012 10:56 AM, Alexander Johannesen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  > I recently started using gist™, a freely available minimalist upper
>  > enterprise ontology developed by Semantic Arts*.
>
> Yes, exactly the kind of thing I'm after. And it looks good, missing a
> few things that I can easily sub-class. I think I'll give this a good
> go, thanks!
>
> Alex
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 11:27:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:27 UTC