Hi Alexander, finally, if you are really not happy with the various available and suggested ontologies out there, you could of course build your own ontology of your intended application domain, publish it, and I guess there are other interested persons out there who could assist you by (mainly) mapping your ontology terms back to appropriated existing ones. Cheers, Bo PS: Intranet domain sounds a bit strange in my mind - (as already suggested) enterprise/business domain might be a bit more appropriated, or? So maybe you simply searched for the wrong terms, which is not really your fault, because finding appropriated ontologies is still a huge problem. Although, the situation there is getting better and better in the last times (see LOV, schemapedia, ...) On 2/21/2012 10:56 AM, Alexander Johannesen wrote: > Hi, > > > I recently started using gist™, a freely available minimalist upper > > enterprise ontology developed by Semantic Arts*. > > Yes, exactly the kind of thing I'm after. And it looks good, missing a > few things that I can easily sub-class. I think I'll give this a good > go, thanks! > > AlexReceived on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 11:27:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:27 UTC