W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > February 2012

RE: Intranet ontology?

From: Dave McComb <dave.mccomb@semanticarts.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:05:59 -0500
To: Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com>, Michael Uschold <michael.uschold@semanticarts.com>
CC: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D65A20EF5890634BB49C04BDA61A13E4C0686DB011@VMBX101.ihostexchange.net>
If you would let us know the kind of things you're subclassing would appreciate it.  We have several "sub gists" that aren't quite stable enough to put out for public consumption, but may contain some of the things you're looking for

From: Alexander Johannesen [mailto:alexander.johannesen@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 2:57 AM
To: Michael Uschold
Cc: Dave McComb; Semantic Web
Subject: Re: Intranet ontology?


> I recently started using gist(tm), a freely available minimalist upper
> enterprise ontology developed by Semantic Arts*.

Yes, exactly the kind of thing I'm after. And it looks good, missing a few things that I can easily sub-class. I think I'll give this a good go, thanks!

Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 09:24:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:27 UTC