- From: Markus Krötzsch <markus.kroetzsch@cs.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 14:55:06 +0100
- To: Bob Ferris <zazi@smiy.org>
- CC: semantic-web@w3.org
On 08/08/12 14:28, Bob Ferris wrote: > Hi all, > > btw how about dct:source [1] or dct:publisher [2] as source (is derived > from) property? Correct me if I am wrong, but I think prov has better OWL compatibility by declaring the type of its property (object vs. data). DC says that its properties are "intended to be used with non-literal values" but I am not sure if this is supposed to be a declaration as an object property or not. Cheers, Markus > > Cheers, > > > Bo > > > [1] http://purl.org/dc/terms/source > [2] http://purl.org/dc/terms/publisher > > On 08/08/2012 02:33 PM, Denny Vrandečić wrote: >> Hi Jun, >> >> almost perfect! prov:hadPrimarySource is a tiny bit too strong (it >> requires that source is from first-hand direct experience etc.), >> whereas its superproperty prov:wasDerivedFrom is a bit too weak, but >> can be used here. >> >> So if there was a prov:hadSource between these two, I would gladly use >> it, not having the strong requirements for the source. >> Otherwise I will settle for prov:wasDerivedFrom for now. >> >> Thank you again, that helped a lot! >> >> Cheers, >> Denny >> >> >> 2012/8/8 Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>: >>> Hi Denny, >>> >>> >>> On 08/08/2012 13:05, Denny Vrandečić wrote: >>>> >>>> Every statement has an IRI. And the source will also have an IRI >>>> describing it (i.e. an IRI for the statistical yearbook, an IRI for >>>> the mentioned paper). >>> >>> >>> By this, do you really specially asking for a property to express that a >>> statement about an entity is derived from a certain primary source? >>> >>> How about the http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/#hadPrimarySource? >>> >>> Note that there are some renaming going on around this property. If >>> you want >>> to use more than the above property, such as prov:source or >>> prov:qualifiedSource, then please ping us before you do so. >>> >>> HTH, >>> >>> Jun >>> >>> >>>> >>>> What I did not figure out is: which property from the provenance >>>> ontology can I use to connect the statement IRI to the source IRI? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jun Zhao, PhD >>> EPSRC Postdoctoral Fellow >>> Department of Zoology >>> University of Oxford >>> Tinbergen Building, South Parks Road >>> Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK > > -- Dr. Markus Kroetzsch Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford Room 306, Parks Road, OX1 3QD Oxford, United Kingdom +44 (0)1865 283529 http://korrekt.org/
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2012 13:55:34 UTC