Re: Wikidata export in RDF

Hi all,

btw how about dct:source [1] or dct:publisher [2] as source (is derived 
from) property?

Cheers,


Bo


[1] http://purl.org/dc/terms/source
[2] http://purl.org/dc/terms/publisher

On 08/08/2012 02:33 PM, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
> Hi Jun,
>
> almost perfect! prov:hadPrimarySource is a tiny bit too strong (it
> requires that source is from first-hand direct experience etc.),
> whereas its superproperty prov:wasDerivedFrom is a bit too weak, but
> can be used here.
>
> So if there was a prov:hadSource between these two, I would gladly use
> it, not having the strong requirements for the source.
> Otherwise I will settle for prov:wasDerivedFrom for now.
>
> Thank you again, that helped a lot!
>
> Cheers,
> Denny
>
>
> 2012/8/8 Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>:
>> Hi Denny,
>>
>>
>> On 08/08/2012 13:05, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
>>>
>>> Every statement has an IRI. And the source will also have an IRI
>>> describing it (i.e. an IRI for the statistical yearbook, an IRI for
>>> the mentioned paper).
>>
>>
>> By this, do you really specially asking for a property to express that a
>> statement about an entity is derived from a certain primary source?
>>
>> How about the http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/#hadPrimarySource?
>>
>> Note that there are some renaming going on around this property. If you want
>> to use more than the above property, such as prov:source or
>> prov:qualifiedSource, then please ping us before you do so.
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> Jun
>>
>>
>>>
>>> What I did not figure out is: which property from the provenance
>>> ontology can I use to connect the statement IRI to the source IRI?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jun Zhao, PhD
>> EPSRC Postdoctoral Fellow
>> Department of Zoology
>> University of Oxford
>> Tinbergen Building, South Parks Road
>> Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK

Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2012 13:29:13 UTC