- From: Bob Ferris <zazi@elbklang.net>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 10:44:08 +0200
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
Hi Martin, that looks good. However, I would prefer to utilise dc:title instead of gr:name and dc:description instead of gr:description. I guess, this issue was already discussed somewhere, somehow, or? Cheers, Bob On 5/3/2011 8:56 AM, Martin Hepp wrote: > Dear all: > > I tried to visualize the minimal RDF pattern for using GoodRelations in a way compatible with both Google and the Semantic Web at large. > Attached, please find the respective illustration. > > It is meant as a complement to the complete GoodRelations UML diagram. > > Best wishes > > Martin
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 08:44:30 UTC